Jul 21, 2016 · Does using the 'catch, when' feature make exception handling faster because the handler is skipped as such and the stack unwinding can happen much earlier as when compared to handling …

Jul 27, 2014 · 62 You cannot use try-catch statements to handle exceptions thrown asynchronously, as the function has "returned" before any exception is thrown. You should instead use the promise.then …

22 If there is a hierarchy of exceptions you can use the base class to catch all subclasses of exceptions. In the degenerate case you can catch all Java exceptions with:

Will Try-Catch capture all errors that @@ERROR can? In the following code fragment, is it worthwhile to check for @@ERROR? Will RETURN 1111 ever occur? SET XACT_ABORT ON BEGIN …

May 18, 2010 · Finally and catch blocks are quite different: Within the catch block you can respond to the thrown exception. This block is executed only if there is an unhandled exception and the type …

Catch will only run if an exception is thrown and the catch block can handle that type of exception. The finally block is the one that will run when the try block is complete.

In the second scheme, if the promise p rejects, then the .catch() handler is called. If you return a normal value or a promise that eventually resolves from the .catch() handler (thus "handling" the error), then …

David, that only applies to the catch (Exception e) part. And that is separate from throw vs throw e.

37 You don't need to cover every block with try-catches because a try-catch can still catch unhandled exceptions thrown in functions further down the call stack. So rather than have every function have a …

Apr 14, 2014 · This is my first time writing transaction, is it correct/best practice to have the TRY/CATCH block inside the transaction or should the transaction be inside the TRY block?