Recent developments have significantly impacted the manner in which patent practitioners respond to final rejections issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The widely utilized After ...
“The USPTO apparently gives each Technology Center the discretion as to when and how they choose to process petitions, and even who has authority to decide such petitions. This results in significant ...
“With the sunset of the After Final Consideration Pilot (AFCP) 2.0 approaching, patent practitioners who once relied on AFCP 2.0 will need to modify their practices to account for the return to ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback